Rant: On mp3 and other audio formats
by GMM on September 10th 2007, at 23:24 CET

You know guys I thought long and hard (read: 20 secs) about that, before ripping, if I should go lossless or whatever as an intermediate step. I decided not to for a few fundamental reasons:

  1.  Quality. I never find myself in a listening situation where I could be able to tell, IMO, the theoretical difference between 320 kbps mp3 audio and lossless audio - or for that matter, the difference between 256 kbps AAC and lossless. I'm not a hi-fi freak, I love music not audio, and some of my most cherished moments with music has been with horrible audio quality in a state where anything goes. Mad beats are mad wether 128 or 1280 kbps.
  2. Availability. I'm super lazy, so if I have to re-encode to whatever format my current listening device supports, I just wont' do it. If I had all of my music in a proprietary format, it would be just that, a bunch of proprietary files on my disk never being accessed. Neither my ipod nor my cellphone support any usable formats except mp3. I'm too lazy to transcode.
  3. And third, and this is most important. Rest of post on this:

One can not DRM-ifize mpeg layer 3. Mp3 is a holy format that must never, ever die or be left behind. The alternatives will kill music. Mp3 is what keeps digital music alive, it is the current lifeblood of music and it was the spark that ignited the revolution. Because it is all-encompassing, it works everywhere, any product that wants to survive MUST support the mp3 format.

Ogg, Flac, whatever, yes they are brilliant and good and perfect and better options technically than mp3. But they do not have the sheer massive force of mp3, they do not carry any weight on their own. Being better is not necessarily good enough in today's world. (I KNOW.)

Do you not realize that if we fragment audio formats, there will eventually come something "better" to replace mp3, and you can bet your flOGGed ass it will be crippled and controlled and preloaded with DRM crap and we will all hate it. Blue-ray? HD-DVD? Does anyone really WANT those?

IF there comes a new global audio format, it will only be the result of years of standardization done by huge corporations in coop with dirty lobbying from content producers (read: major labels, Hollywood, TV/radio networks, Microsoft etc), and it will SUCK MUD. It will be impossible to use for anything proper, and it will be hacked within two days, and a never ending battle between users and producers will kill us all.

The reason mp3 is important is because it MUST NOT DIE as a format. It MUST NOT become a tool of the trade, it has to stay a tool for both the users and the producers. My mom knows to play an mp3. She has no idea what ogg or flac is, and if she is forced into using another format you and I and DVD-Jon all know that it won't be flac or ogg, it will be whatever format Microsoft or Apple or someone else than her has decided is good for her. She does not approach these matters as we do and she shouldn't. There are more moms than DVD-Jons in the world. This is why mp3 is important. It is established pre-DRM. Every time you choose to use mp3 you reinforce the power of mp3. Therefore I use mp3 and I will until the end of the world or something better, in all aspects, comes along.

Good god I should written this as a separate journal entry. Oh, look I just did. Hah, thats the power of writing and running your own blog software. I'm like the Fraunhofer Institute of blogs!

 

 


#1, by georgeblunt on September 11th 2007, at 08:12
hey, you got your point. No question. It's true, that without mp3 we wouldn't be where we are now. BUT: if - as you claim - the industry decides to establish a new format, they will, and they won't look at me using ogg NOR your mom using mp3. In fact, I think they would hava a bigger problem if the all dominating format wouldn't be mp3, but a standard for which every manufacturer of players is able to produce players for, without paying huge amounts of fees to some rights holder.
Yes, ogg is superior technically as it is smaller, supports gapless playback etc. etc... but the most important fact is, that it's open! The industry can do nothing about it. It is open and it will stay open. And you can play it on every software player without installing proprietary decoders.
As i said, i know where you're coming from and you said some very true things in your post. But you have to admit, that ogg isn't only the better product technically.. it's the open standard which makes it so powerful.
Let's just hope, that neither of both formats die because of some industry idea about enslaving the whole world to some drm-crippled, never-used, all-hated dip-sh*t.

#2, by mray on September 11th 2007, at 11:13
I have to second georgeblunts ideas here.

But before I do that I need to say that I ABSOLUTELY LOVE your music! Thank you so much! You definetely provided me with a lot of "most cherished moments"!

The reason why I raise my voice against the master is because he IS a master, AND a shining example! OGG and Flac are obviously the right choices today. I think there will be a successor for the old father of lossy music one way or the other. I see much more sense in laying the right path for the future than trying to stop the inevitable progress.
Every good portable player supports ogg these days, too.
Besides I BET your mom knows what DVD is - but not what HD-DVD or Bluray means. ;)

If you really want to kick butts in hollywood and the music industry: kick them with something OPEN. That hurts most :D

But your music rocks anyway!

#3, by GMM on September 13th 2007, at 14:31
I agree with you in heart, soul and brain, OGG is better in all aspects. Except one; popularity. As far as practically possible I will support it, and if I can I will help promote it, and other options, but both in my case and most of my fans, working with OGG adds an extra step of work.

The best solution is not always the best solution :)

I will think more about this and come up with another rant up ahead because i'm very interested and involved in matters like these

#4, by Squirsier on September 20th 2007, at 13:52
They better not kill mp3s. I am NOT re-ripping 800+ worth of CDs into another format. Ain't gonna happen.